Revolutionary Misfit

Dare to be Inspirational

  • Impact Mindfulness
    • The Movement
    • Impact over Interest
    • The Big US
    • Removing Impact Blinders
    • People Planet Universe
    • Revolutionary Misfit Creed
  • The Blog & Podcast
    • Blog Archive
    • World Changers Expat Podcast
    • The LA County Jail Series
    • Costa Rica Expat Tours
    • About the Author
  • Books
    • The Rev Misfit Manifesto
    • The Impact Revolution
    • Expat Mindfulness – The Book
    • Definitive Guide to CR Expat Living

Individualism Run Amok

June 28, 2020 by costaricaguy 1 Comment

Individualism Run Amok

There are different ways I could express what, in my humble opinion, is wrong with the U.S.A. these days…

some more offensive than others…

So, let’s try for a potentially less offensive expression.

John F. Kennedy, Jr., our 35th President, implored the country, in his 1961 inaugural address, to…

ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.

Perhaps unintentionally, what he did in that quote was encourage collectivism over individualism.

Hold on, now I’m sure that for some, I’ve already begun treading into the offensive!

Because any idea that connotes collectivism immediately, for too many, conjures up the boogeyman of socialism, or worse, communism.

Nevertheless, JFK was in fact suggesting individual service to the collective, rather that the more individualistic (and capitalistic) notion of the having the collective serve the individual.

What do I mean by that exactly?

Well, let’s first define what is truly meant by “the collective.”

In a word, “the collective” refers to us…the Big US, or as I will hereinafter refer, U.S., as in the “U.S.” of A…

Now, the collective expresses its will (or so it should) via government action. That is, when the government is operating the way it is supposed to operate, i.e., of, by, and for the people.

I have referred often in the blog to a concept that I call “capitalism run amok.” In this post I’ve changed that to “individualism run amok.”

See there, doesn’t that seem less offensive?

What I am getting at with that subtle change is simply a catchy way to refer to the current social and economic situation in our country. A situation in which the individual has gained, or seeks to gain, the ability to manipulate the collective will for his or her own individual ends.

That’s the unavoidable end result of capitalism run amok.

That is, a situation in which the government (U.S.) no longer is an expression of collective will, but of a handful of individual wills, those who have amassed the economic power, through unbridled capitalistic freedom, to manipulate the so-called collective will.

Of course, once government can be so manipulated for individual ends, it no longer represents the collective will, wouldn’t you agree?

We have come to the point in the U.S.A. where most seem to believe in a market solution to every problem…

That if the government (i.e., the collective will) simply steps aside and allows the market to work on its own, everything will magically work out…

But is it working out, really?

Right now the country is faced with problems the likes of which none of U.S. have experienced in our lifetimes…

Donald J. Trump, the poster-child of individualism run amok, tells U.S. to just “open up the market” and all will be well…

However, the facts don’t demonstrate that all will be well. In fact, the truth demonstrates anything but that.

America was built via rugged individualism…by those “rugged individuals” who rode on the backs of the less fortunate and powerless. It has always been that way.

Now, am I saying that individualism is bad?

No, I’m saying that individualism run amok is bad.

I’m saying that when we allow the collective will to be manipulated and to serve individual will, rather than U.S., then we run into problems. The longer we let that go on, the more severe those problems get.

Right now, they’ve gotten so severe as to threaten the long-term health and sustainable of our country as a whole.

So, what’s the solution?

What is a healthy degree of individualism?

Individualism rests on the ego-driven notion that the individual stands apart from his or her environment and that the latter exists to serve the former…

But that’s just not really true.

Now, I won’t get into a long-winded discussion of how the ego doesn’t even really exist at all…

Nevertheless, we are served by our egos to a great extent. After all, it’s the ego that motivates us to strain and strive for a better and more comfortable individual existence. It’s our ego that works to motivate action the lends toward the propagation of our species.

And who doesn’t want that?

I know I do! I work for it everyday…

And that’s a good thing.

But when we get so caught up with this notion of separate-ness that we lose sight of U.S., then problems with individualism run amok tend to arise.

Remember, U.S., or the collective, expresses its will via government action…

The type of action that actually serves U.S…

Lately our government has been doing anything but that!

And we make the mistake of allowing that situation to go on because we think that the market, which exists to serve the individual, always knows better, even better than U.S.!

But it doesn’t. Aren’t we seeing proof of that right now?

The market serves as a way for the individual to manipulate the collective…to stand apart from it and transact with it in order to derive some individual benefit. One very important function of government action, i.e., collective will, is to make sure there are rules in place that prevent this form of manipulation from getting out of hand…

However, it has, indeed, gotten out of hand.

I believe a more healthier form of individualism is one in which we do strive for a better individual existence, but we do so in a way that is cognizant of what JFK implored…

That we should prioritize the impact of our actions, so that as a whole they serve to benefit the collective, over and above our own individual self-interest.

Isn’t that exactly what JFK’s quote is all about? Haven’t you ever been inspired by it?

A whole generation of Americans were!

Maybe we need to get back to that sense of inspirational impact…

That sense of inspiration that would never protest the simple and painless act of wearing a mask in order to protect our collective health!

That sense of inspiration that would cause all of U.S., of every color and creed, to stand in solidarity with those of U.S. who are being persecuted by a government that has ceased to serve as an expression of the collective will!

A healthy degree of individualism is one that wholly rejects the notion that the collective exists to serve any group of individuals who have been able to manipulate it via economic and political power…

Collective will exists to serve the powerless, not the powerful…

Individualism run amok is not the way it’s supposed to work folks…

But that’s the way it is working…

Isn’t it high time for a change?

A once in a lifetime opportunity will avail itself come November 3rd!

Filed Under: Impact over Interest Tagged With: individualism run amok

The Hardest Thing About COVID-19: Uncertainty

March 21, 2020 by costaricaguy 2 Comments

The Hardest Thing About COVID-19

We humans have a love/hate relationship with uncertainty. We like a certain degree of it in our lives. We like to say that “variety is the spice of life.”

But, too much of it can paralyze us with fear…

That seems to be about where we are right now with this pandemic. The hardest thing about COVID-19 is the uncertainty.

Here are a few facts about this disease that might help you face the uncertainty…

An important thing to understand about this highly contagious disease is its basic reproduction number, or R-naught (R0). In epidemiology, the basic reproduction number of an infection can be thought of as the expected number of cases directly generated by one case in a population where all individuals are susceptible to infection. All individuals (at least all of those who haven’t already caught it and recovered) are susceptible to COVID-19. There is no vaccine for COVID-19, nor any human immunity.

Scientists have estimated COVID-19’s R0 as between 1.5 and 3. Compare that to the measles, which has an R0 of 12 – 18. The higher the R0 is, the harder it is to control an outbreak. The goal of all the social distancing, hand-washing and testing being mandated is to bring the R0 down to under 1. Once it’s under 1, the spreading will decrease (the curve will flatten and begin to show a downward trend), hopefully long enough to develop a vaccine and kill the damn thing off once and for all!

The other thing we sort of have a handle on with COVID-19 is its fatality rate. It seems to be around 2%, even though in some places, like Italy, the experience has been almost double that (Italy has a much older general population that the U.S.). Compare that rate to the fatality rate of the common flu (around .1%) or ebola (from 25 to 90%). While it’s much worse than the flu, it’s still not that high. Most who get sick will recover and develop an immunity against it, which will also make the rate of spread go down.

I am no expert, but I’ve certainly been trying to understand all the hoopla concerning this virus. The statistics above give me cause for both concern and hope.

The R0 of this infection is not insurmountable. We can get on top of it, as we have with other infectious viruses with similar R0’s (SARS and MERS come immediately to mind). The question is how fast and how much damage will it do in the meantime. The answer is quite a lot, although judging by the fatality rate for this virus, the vast majority of those who succumb to it will recover. Even so, it’s alarming to think that 2% of the potentially millions infected could die from this, if we don’t get a handle on it quick and reduce that R0.

Even though there’s uncertainty in the health risk posed by COVID-19, that risk doesn’t worry me as much as the risk of the havoc it will wreak on healthy lives, especially economic havoc, while we take drastic and economically paralyzing measures to deal with said health risk.

I sell real estate in Costa Rica…to foreigners, for the most part. Will the real estate market here be affected by this? It already is. When a country completely closes its borders to entry of all foreigners, it tends to greatly decrease my customer base!

So, the short-term negative effect is a certainty. The uncertainty is, how short (or long) will short-term be?

I can, at least, fantasize some silver-linings in this cloud over the longer term. But I don’t know when, if ever, they might actually materialize to my economic benefit.

However, this is not a post about COVID-19’s impact on the real estate market in Costa Rica. It’s being written to help me and you deal with the hardest thing about COVID-19…the uncertainty it has inspired. The stock market has gone down almost 20% due to that uncertainty.

So, how best can we cope with the hardest thing about COVID-19?

Well, being factually informed helps. Turning off the TV helps. Meditation helps. Stepping back and surveying the big picture helps…

And looking at this as a chance to make a positive impact on your species, certainly helps…

One sure way not to do that is to become overwhelmed with worry, either about getting sick, or about how this event might affect your pocket-book. A self-centered retreat, reflected in actions like hoarding toilet paper, will not help you reduce the mental anguish of uncertainty, I don’t believe.

My last post was entitled COVID-19: A Viral Perspective. In that one I discussed how COVID-19 is sharpening our focus concerning the risks posed by things like Globalization, Capitalism Run Amok, the ascent of Fake News, and the presidency of Donald J. Trump…

COVID-19 might be humanity’s chance at getting some things right that have gone awfully wrong in the last few decades. I have written in the past on how I feel that greed is at the root of many of our problems. What I mean by greed is the tendency for humans to prioritize self-interest over selfless impact…

For example, it will be interesting to see how the pharmaceutical industry reacts to this, as the race for a vaccine is well under way. Will they react out of compassion, or greed?

Stay tuned…

You see, as a result of this microscopic parasite we’re all of a sudden being asked to dramatically alter our lifestyle…for the good of others.

And that’s exactly what this blog’s been about for the last, ah, six odd years. In a nutshell, what we’re being collectively faced with is the need for impact mindfulness. We can either embrace it, or go on living a purely self-interested way (hoarding toilet paper) and millions will probably die.

So, it’s pretty much completely up to us, as far as the health impacts go…

Yes, COVID-19 will most likely lighten our wallets, reduce our portfolios, and may even force us to skip a fancy dinner or two…

But that might be a small price to pay for the enlightenment that can potentially come via our adopting impact mindfulness as a habit in our daily lives.

As I also said in my previous post, habits, especially life-style altering ones, are hard to instill. It always helps to have a darn good reason…

Our salvation just might qualify as one…

What do you think?

Filed Under: Impact over Interest Tagged With: COVID-19

COVID-19: A Viral Perspective

March 15, 2020 by costaricaguy 2 Comments

COVID-19: A Viral Perspective

Just in case you haven’t heard, there’s a bug going round…

Oh ok, I guess you have heard…

One thing about this particular virus (at least for me) is that it’s encouraging a viral perspective of our world and place within it…

I’m especially referring to the following 5 areas of focus…

Globalization

Viruses have always been avid world travelers. Even way back in 1918, before the advent of air travel, the Spanish Flu infected 500 million people around the world, or about 27% of the then world population of between 1.8 and 1.9 billion.

But these days, just one of these little bugs can hitch a jet ride from Wuhan (China) to Wilmington (N.C. or Delaware) inside the mucous membrane of an unsuspecting airline passenger and arrive within hours, allowing an infection to jump from continent to continent, riding first class at 500 mph!

We have to face the fact that our interconnectedness, commercially and socially, has put US (the big one, that is) at greater risk, even as it has lifted our quality of life.

For the past several years there’s been a backlash against globalization, primarily in the form of right-wing anti-immigration movements. Does COVID-19 bolster their case?

In a way, I guess, but I don’t believe globalization is going to go the way of the buggy whip anytime soon. Better to learn to live with it, even at some risk to our health, than attempt to fight the inevitable. Hopefully, COVID-19 will teach us a thing or two about how to reduce the risk for the future.

Capitalism

At the same time that right-wingers are decrying globalism, left-wingers are sounding the alarm against “capitalism run amok.”

Speaking of capitalism run amok, I read today that Donald Trump might be trying to buy exclusive rights to a future COVID-19 vaccine from a German firm, so that Americans would have access to it at the exclusion of everyone else.

Do I really need to ask if you can see what might be wrong with that idea?

[Note: The story referred to is not verified. Source was The Guardian. I posted it for illustrative purposes only…for all you out there ready to fake-news-shame me.]

But that’s sort of how capitalism works, right? It looks at life as a zero-sum contest where every transaction has a winner and a loser. And with the brand of capitalism that has come to dominate the world in the last, say, 50 years, there are precious few winners (around 1%) and a whole lot of losers (the rest of us).

A bright side of COVID-19 (if I may be so bold) could be that it will shine a spotlight on the failures of the current out-of-control capitalistic system and the neoliberal world order that has taken hold to foment it.

Scientific and Mathematic Truth

Lately every news item that’s detrimental to a particular political opinion is decried by the opposing side as fake news. Our very president has basically undermined the entire free press in the U.S. (at least any part of it other than Fox News and the few radio and TV talking heads that say nice things about him) as such. This has given rise to a dangerous phenomenon in which Americans can’t even agree on things that should be viewed as universal fact, or truth. Take the settled science of global warming, as a for instance.

And now even the existence of this virus is being labeled by some on the hard-right as a democratic (meaning communist) plot to derail the chances for Donald Trump to be elected to a second term.

Denying the existence of known threats to humanity, for political, religious, or idealogical reasons is, well, downright insanity.

And it is very dangerous to our national collective health.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump has seemed fairly invulnerable, until now. Hillary Clinton couldn’t defeat him (even after pussy-grabber-gate), the Special Counsel couldn’t nail him, and the Senate wouldn’t remove him (even though he was impeached by the House). He is the real and undisputed “teflon Don.” Well, that was until he addressed the nation the other night to outline his attack on this microscopic bug called COVID-19. His attempt to assuage the masses (and the markets) didn’t work. And his mighty “Trump economy” is currently at risk of failing as a direct and immediate result.

There’s not a whole lot Trump can point to proudly, other than the economy. So, if his economy goes down, it’s highly likely that Trump will go with it.

COVID-19 might just end up being what finally brings down the Donald.

Impact Mindfulness

We’re hearing a lot about “social distancing” these days. Basically, that means altering your habits to avoid too much direct human interaction. But old habits are hard to break, unless you have a really compelling reason to break them…

COVID-19 is providing that reason…to save others.

But if you’re not at risk of catching this thing (or, at least, dying from it), why should you limit your daily activities to binge watching Netflix?

Well, you’re being asked to right now. It’s not often that we’re called to so high a duty as to seriously alter our life-styles for the benefit of society as a whole.

That’s a level of altruism that’s probably making Ayn Rand roll around in her grave!

Moreover it’s just not consistent with the self-interested, small-us thinking that usually prevails in our dog-eat-dog, hard-core, capitalist, society.

And that might be the number 1 silver lining in this dark cloud we suddenly find ourselves under. Humans being generally mindful of their impacts on others AND in the U.S. even…who would’ve thunk it?

That might be a reason for us to say…

Hey thanks, COVID-19!

And that’s just a viral perspective of this COVID-19 pandemic…

Be safe out there (and wash your hands!).

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: COVID-19

A Purpose for Consciousness

December 4, 2018 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

A Purpose for Consciousness

Yuval Noah Harari, whose writings I referenced in my last post, entitled, A Philosophy of Everything, tells us that technological advances in infotech and biotech are driving a de-coupling between consciousness and intelligence.

That sounds odd because we tend to think that the two, intelligence and consciousness, are one and the same, or at least closely linked.

Ah, but you see, they really aren’t.

The reason we tend to believe that they are is because thinking generally accompanies feeling, and vice versa. Even though we don’t really need the feeling, or emotion, of fear (or anger) for the intelligence of our brains to make our legs (or fists) move, we always seem to have that feeling anytime we come across some external stimuli that inspires a fight or flight response.

The geniuses of Silicon Valley are well aware of this de-coupling. They are well aware that intelligence can exist, and does in fact exist in the form of AI (artificial intelligence), completely divorced from the consciousness that seems only capable of being experienced by organic beings.

So, what’s the purpose of consciousness? Does it have any redeeming purpose whatsoever, or is just like background noise? Does the brain really need consciousness in order to do its work? The fact that there are millions of intelligent operations going on inside your body every moment, controlled by your brain, but without your being the least bit conscious of them, tends to suggest that it doesn’t.

In my post, A Philosophy of Everything, I offered the following vague statement of purpose for consciousness…

The philosophy of everything that I’m alluding to is one in which this higher level of consciousness, as the root of objective reality, is that which gives meaning to our existence. It is the tie that binds everything together, regardless of which stories we might have individually bought into. At this unifying level of consciousness we feel compassionate towards our fellow humans. We do not allow stories to distract us from our inherent commonality.

I also alluded to the fact that the obvious way most of us experience consciousness on a day-to-day basis is at the level of the ego, or the self. We become conscious at a very early age that we are separate from everything around us…of the dual role between subject and object.

But is that really what our consciousness exists to do? That is, to separate us? My philosophy of everything suggests not and I wanted to delve a little deeper into that idea with this post.

Of course it is true, as Harari tells us, that science hasn’t the foggiest idea what consciousness is and even less why it is. So, anything I suggest in this post is, of course, completely unscientific…

Well, almost…

There are some weird things, some “spooky action at a distance”, if you will, that science has discovered about reality, that appears to perhaps be a function of consciousness. Some of this weird stuff even goes so far as to suggest that consciousness is the root of all reality.

You’ve probably heard about the famous “double-slit” experiment. But, if not, here’s a brief (and unscientifically crude) explanation…

Scientists fire particles (photons in the form of a beam) at a barrier with two vertical slits. Some of the particles go through one slit and some go through the other. This should project an expected stacked particle pattern onto the backdrop. However, the weird thing is that the resulting pattern is instead what is called an “interference pattern”, which is indicative of a wave function. It seems that the individual particles somehow go through both slits, as if they were waves rather than particles.

Now, if that weren’t weird enough, it gets even weirder. When the scientists place a detector in front of the barrier to monitor which slit the particles enter, the pattern changes. It becomes the normal pattern one would expect particles to exhibit, rather than the strange wave pattern.

Why in the world does this happen? Why would the act of measurement, requiring a conscious observer, cause the wave pattern to collapse?

No one has a clue…

The implication, however, is clear. The act of conscious observation seems to cause the particles to choose a certain form. And the implications of that are fairly profound for the role consciousness could play in the existence of our universe.

Not long ago a theoretical physicist turned surfer dude named Garrett Lisi came up with an alternative to “String Theory” he calls e8 Theory. Lisi strongly believes his e8 Theory to be a better candidate for a theory of everything that finally unites general relativity and quantum physics. Rather than attempt another crude explanation, I’ll suffice it to say for our purposes that others, specifically a group called the Quantum Gravity Research Group, have taken Lisi’s theory much deeper with their “Emergence Theory”, which suggests that consciousness could play the key role in forming the building blocks of reality.

Now, neither of these theories are anywhere close to being considered acceptable science, but the fact remains that science is more and more looking at the role consciousness plays in our reality.

However, it doesn’t seem to me that this role would simply be one of self-consciousness, ego-driven separation and the duality of subject and object. I am led to believe that something quite the opposite might be going on…

My last post suggested, based largely on what Harari says in his books, that it’s the fictional layer of reality comprised of the stories we make up that’s motivating the ego to do its dirty work of separation (usually for self-preservation). And dirty it is as this separation has certainly caused much of the strife in our world.

And yet there seems to be this higher level of consciousness in which the duality of subject and object melts away. Many have experienced this higher level though psychedelic drugs, while others have achieved it via an intense practice of meditation.

The universal way consciousness tends to be felt by organic species is via pain and pleasure. In fact, we are buffeted about during our entire lives between these two polar opposites of consciousness…that is, until we discover that there is a way to rise above it. And maybe that’s exactly what consciousness beckons us to do.

I heard Ram Dass once say that “the purpose behind an incarnation is the elimination of suffering”, or something along those lines.

You might be asking, how can I sit here and conjecture that consciousness could have such a purpose, or really any purpose at all?

I don’t know…and in fact I’m really just thinking out loud (and trying to inspire you to do that same) with these crazy posts…

However, it’s evident to me that consciousness does indeed permeate our reality. It is something we share. It is something that connects us and on that higher level of connection (what Ram Dass calls “loving awareness”) motivates profound compassion, one incarnate being towards another.

Perhaps then we should not be trying to ascribe a purpose for consciousness, but rather try to better understand the purpose and meaning it ascribes to us.

I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.

Max Planck

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: consciousness, double-slit experiment, e8 theory, garrett lisi, ram dass, Yuval Noah Harari

A Philosophy of Everything

November 28, 2018 by costaricaguy 1 Comment

A Philosophy of Everything

The greatest scientific quest of the 21st century has been (and continues to be) a “theory of everything” that ties general relativity and quantum mechanics together. The missing link between the two is a quantum description of the gravitation force that we are all very familiar with.

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about a similar notion of a “philosophy of everything.” That is, a common philosophy that encompasses economics, politics, and science, and melds it all into a general meaning for our existence on this microscopically small revolving blue rock in the middle of a vast universe.

It seems that the “tie that binds” it all together is consciousness. I know that might sound weird, but more and more that’s what “they” are saying. By they I mean many of the current notable philosophical and spiritual thinkers (and even some scientists). After all, one of the greatest mysteries in science, in addition to quantum gravity, is the nature of consciousness…what exactly is it and where did it come from? The conundrum of consciousness is akin to the what came first, chicken or egg, riddle. That is, does the mind (i.e., our biological brain) produce consciousness, or vice versa. In fact, there is growing evidence that the root of reality is indeed, consciousness.

The spiritual, philosophical and scientific thinkers that I’m referring to are the likes of neuroscientist, Sam Harris, spiritual guru, Baba Ram Dass, historian and philosopher, Yuval Noah Harari, among others.

Particularly illuminating to me as of late has been the trilogy of books by Yuval Noah Harari. Those are, in order of their publication, Sapiens, Homo Deus, and his latest book, 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. If you haven’t read them, you certainly should.

Harari tell us that humans now live in a dual reality. Actually, we’ve sort of been living in one since the dawning of civilization, which encompasses only 1/3 of 1% of the 1.5 million year history of our species. There’s the objective reality of the things we can see, touch, taste, hear and smell. And then there’s this fictional layer of reality that has been superimposed by us over that objective reality. The fictional layer is comprised of made-up stories…yea that’s right, fairy tales, more or less.

Now, even though these stories are not really real, they nevertheless have had enormous impacts upon our species. In fact, Harari tells us that these stories are what has allowed mass human cooperation, which has elevated our species above the 9 million or so others that share space with us on planet Earth. Of course, one of the main categories of stories has to do with religion, but there are many others as well…such as democracy, capitalism, socialism, human rights and even money. All these have no objective existence apart from the stories that we’ve made up and that have become widely accepted.

And that’s not necessarily a bad thing…to a point.

Of course, the story of money has been a great benefit to humankind. Even though these small scraps of paper, generally adorned with grainy images of dead notables, do not have any intrinsic value in and of themselves…well, perhaps to light a fire, or substitute for Scott tissue versus dried leaves on an ill-equipped camping trip…they have facilitated widespread economic cooperation that has had great benefits to human society writ large.

However, it pays to remember that these stories, including the one about money, are, in fact, just stories. We made them up and we can un-make them up.

But here’s the thing, the stories have now taken on such an elevated and integrated role in human society that in many ways they now command objective reality itself. Take the capitalist economic story that led to the great industrial revolution that swept across the globe and elevated the quality of life for billions. We have come to realize, through science, that this story and the cooperative action it has spawned across the human race is now actually commanding the objective reality of our planet’s climate…to the potential risk of our very extinction!

Political and religious stories have been both good and bad. While they have given birth to nations and inspired the exploration of new geographic frontiers, they have also given rise to massive and completely unnecessary wars, death and mayhem.

These stories are so powerful that not only do they command the objective “exterior” reality of our day-to-day existence, they command the “interior” as well. In other words, they are so powerful as to effect consciousness itself.

On the level of the ego, which is the level of consciousness where most of us mere mortals live on a day-to-day basis, these stories reign supreme. They deeply influence our almost every conscious thought and thus command the actions flowing from those thoughts.

In short, these stories are powerful things, both for good and for bad.

However, the ego level is only one lower level of consciousness. There are higher ones. I know that might sound a little “out there” for some who could be reading this. But if you’ve ever tried meditation you’ll quickly learn that you’re really not in control of your thoughts at all. The stories are in control, as well as parts of your brain that have evolved over million of years and still harbor fight or flight notions that dominated the consciousness of our distant cave-dwelling ancestors. The goal of meditation is to quiet all that down and reach a higher level of consciousness where the stories in fact do NOT reign supreme. And that is inherently achievable, as millions of meditators do it quite successfully as a daily practice.

The philosophy of everything that I’m alluding to is one in which this higher level of consciousness, as the root of objective reality, is that which gives meaning to our existence. It is the tie that binds everything together, regardless of which stories we might have individually bought into. At this unifying level of consciousness we feel compassionate towards our fellow humans. We do not allow stories to distract us from our inherent commonality.

The stories are currently causing widespread division in American society and an alarming lack of compassion between those clinging to these competing fictions, such as democrat and republican.

The point is that we need not cling to the stories. We can choose to use them for our benefit and discard, or modify, them when they no longer serve us well.

We can seek a higher level of consciousness in which these stories do not command our inner, nor our outer, objective realities.

We may be at a point where our future existence depends on a philosophy of everything that leads us to do just that.

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: Baba Ram Dass, Philosophy of Everything, Sam Harris, Theory of Everything, Yuval Noah Harari

Homeopathic Utopia

January 17, 2018 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

Homeopathic Utopia

Being decent is hard, it’s a process…

Jaron Lanier

I recently listened to an episode of the Ezra Klein podcast (my absolute favorite podcast, by the way). He was interviewing Jaron Lanier. You’ve probably never heard of this guy, but he’s an American computer philosophy writer, computer scientist, visual artist, composer of classical music and a pioneer in the field of virtual reality. He’s also a guy who “trip-sat” a dying Richard Feynman on LSD…

Anyway, something I heard on the show that resonated was this idea of “homeopathic utopia.”

What in the hell is that?, you ask…

Well, according to Lanier being decent is hard work. It’s a process that takes a lifetime, or perhaps several lifetimes, to achieve. Rather than trying to change society all at once, by, for instance, revolutionary force, perhaps incremental change on an individual level, properly motivated to bring about desired results, is a better way.

It’s more of a homeopathic, or natural, remedy to societal ills…hence this idea of homeopathic utopia.

Haven’t we seen that throughout history sweeping changes to systems of status quo don’t always bring about those desired results. Revolutionaries that have replaced dictatorial regimes with totalitarian communistic ones is a great example.

Perhaps what we need more of is just good-ole-fashioned common decency, as Lanier suggests.

And that brings me to the salient point of this post…

You see the whole point of this blog, despite its revolutionary moniker, is just that…to inspire decency. The title of the blog, Revolutionary Misfit, probably misleads some to believe that what I’m advocating is sweeping, or “revolutionary”, change, but I’m really not at all. I believe that should become apparent to anyone who actually takes the time to read some of the posts contained herein…

However, many don’t do that and quickly jump to faulty conclusions…and that’s never a good idea.

You see, Impact Mindfulness and common decency are synonymous.

The concept of mindfulness is one you hear a lot about these days, usually in the context of a more meditative day-to-day existence. And I am advocating a sort of meditative, or better yet, contemplative, mode of existence. One in which you actually think, or reflect, before acting. Isn’t that what we have a brain for?

It’s easier to just go through life reacting. My idea is that one can achieve a far better quality of life, for oneself and others who are influenced or impacted by us, by focusing on that pause between stimulus and response.

And what should be the object of our focus? In a word often heard within this blog…

impact.

Impact mindfulness suggests that the best way to manage our impacts, so that they are more positive for people and planet, is by…

  • prioritizing impact over interest
  • embracing the concept of the Big US, and
  • removing impact blinders.

If the above sounds confusing, then think of it in these much simpler terms…

Impact mindfulness suggests that the three most important components of impact are…

  • Altruism
  • Inclusion, and
  • Open-Mindedness.

And if you step back and give that some deep thought, I believe you’ll agree that those three ideas, or states of being, comport far better with reality than their opposites.

For instance, the Ayn Rand-inspired, look out for number one only, ideology that has spawned neoliberalism has reaped some pretty harsh havoc on people and planet. In this blog you’ll find many posts about just that.

Despite what Ayn Rand once said, altruism is good for us. It’s good for others. And it’s good for our planet…pure and simple.

At least that’s what I strongly believe.

Now, if you think altruism is a waste of time and that you should live your life completely self-interested, then I suggest you reflect a bit deeper on what it might mean if everyone thought that way. In actuality, enough already do and that type of thinking has unleashed evils upon us all, such as inequality that’s spiraling out of control, a planet that’s rapidly overheating, and the realistic threat of the 6th great extinction of life on earth.

Embracing the concept of the Big US simply means what Bernie Sanders and Pope Francis often say themselves…that we’re all in this together.

Could anything be more true?

After all, we’re all occupying this revolving rock called planet earth. At present, it’s the only home we have. And the land masses that we occupy are rapidly shrinking as a rising ocean overtakes them inch by inch. So, we’d better learn to get along and think more inclusively.

Nationalistic thinking of the kind inspired by Donald Trump, in the face of a rapidly rising population and a shrinking area of land mass to accommodate it, just doesn’t make a lick of sense and will ultimately lead to disastrous consequences.

Finally, who can argue with the idea of keeping an open mind?

Well, in fact, many do. Usually the main culprits behind close-mindedness are religion and politics. Lately, especially in America, those two have combined to create a sort of tribalism that widely claims legitimate news to be fake and science that is not part of our day-to-day experience as nothing more than unproven theory.

Impact Mindfulness suggest the better way is to keep an open mind about such things. That is, to eagerly search for the truth and not let preconceived notions about the way things are, or ought to be, get in the way of that search.

What I am suggesting here is that the world could become a better place, not by sweeping revolutionary change, but incremental change via mindfulness…impact mindfulness.

This idea of a homeopathic utopia isn’t just pie in the sky, but could become a reality that future generations might enjoy.

Why not start now…before it’s too late?

Along those lines, here’s a quote by Martin Luther King during a famous speech at the Riverside Church that I found inspirational…

We are now faced with the fact, my friends, that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history, there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked, and dejected with a lost opportunity. The tide in the affairs of men does not remain at flood—it ebbs. We may cry out desperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is adamant to every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residues of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words, “Too late.” There is an invisible book of life that faithfully records our vigilance or our neglect. Omar Khayyam is right: “The moving finger writes, and having writ moves on.”

The time for impact mindfulness is not tomorrow…it is now.

This idea is not unrealistic and utopian. It is essential to the betterment of people and planet.

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: Homeopathic Utopia, Jaron Lanier

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 13
  • Next Page »

Connect with RM

Revolutionary Misfit social media connections...

  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Impact Mindfulness
  • The Blog & Podcast
  • Books

Copyright © 2025 · Parallax Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in