Revolutionary Misfit

Dare to be Inspirational

  • Impact Mindfulness
    • The Movement
    • Impact over Interest
    • The Big US
    • Removing Impact Blinders
    • People Planet Universe
    • Revolutionary Misfit Creed
  • The Blog & Podcast
    • Blog Archive
    • World Changers Expat Podcast
    • The LA County Jail Series
    • Costa Rica Expat Tours
    • About the Author
  • Books
    • The Rev Misfit Manifesto
    • The Impact Revolution
    • Expat Mindfulness – The Book
    • Definitive Guide to CR Expat Living

Why is America Failing the COVID-19 Test?

May 2, 2020 by costaricaguy 1 Comment

Why is America Failing the COVID-19 Test?

Costa Rica continues to flatten out the COVID-19 curve for new confirmed cases. The death toll remains at 6. And the active cases curve is on a fast-track to zero, with recovered cases outpacing new ones by about 20 per day.

In fact, Costa Rica’s success in dealing with this crisis is starting to get noticed around the world. I keep seeing New Zealand touted as the world’s model in that regard and Jacinda Ardern certainly deserves loads of credit. But I think Costa Rica definitely deserves a very robust honorable mention.

My question is…what’s up with the U.S.A.? Why is America failing the COVID-19 test?

My home country is supposed to be known for its exceptionalism, but not this way…

The U.S. is leading the world alright…it has become the epicenter for this virus and has one of the highest fatality rates, as well as rate of deaths per million, in the world.

That’s not the kind of exceptionalism we Americans like to boast about!

So, why is America failing the COVID-19 test? Is there something specific to the American psyche that gets right to the heart of an answer?

Because, you know, we Americans love to place blame.

So, what’s (or who’s) to blame here?

In short…we are!

You see, Americans suffer from this compulsion towards a market mindset. That is, the mindset of the market being the solution to every problem. Granted, America has historically enjoyed the most prosperous market on the planet. We are (or have been) the envy of the world in that regard. Americans are therefore somewhat justified in their aggressive market-orientation. And we certainly are so oriented, compared to the rest of the developed world. Our reliance on market solutions for just about everything, from health care to war waging, is unique in this world, to put it mildly…

Good ole’ Bernie Sanders tried over and over to point that out to us. But his loud proclamations to that effect fell on death ears, for the most part.

One only has to hearken back historically to see that the market is not what has gotten us out of deep doo-doo in the past…

We are living through historic times right now. You have to go back to 1918 for a time when a pandemic like COVID-19 has threatened the well-being of every American, as well as the American economy on the whole…

There are some trying to compare this crisis to the common flu that inflicts the nation annually. But this ain’t no flu. The flu has never come close to wreaking the kind of havoc COVID-19 has wrought upon us in only a couple months time…

However, compared to the suffering and hardship endured by Americans through the Great Depression and the ensuing World War, we ain’t seen nothing…yet…

And what exactly got us out of those messes?

Was it the market? Was the market the solution to the Great Depression, or World War II?

Of course not!

What got us out was collective action. By that I mean public action, initiated by the governments we the people delegate our power to, and executed by the blood, sweat, and tears of all Americans.

I’m talking about Roosevelt’s New Deal, the collective effort Americans at home engaged in to support our troops fighting fascism abroad, the GI Bill that helped those same troops and their families get a new start when the lucky ones returned home…

No, the market didn’t save us…we, the collective we, saved us!

Nevertheless and despite what history teaches us, Americans have become afflicted with this market oriented mindset. It’s a mindset that resides on the right and on the left (and in the center). It’s the one that believes we have to allow the market to work its magic and any attempts to interfere, via collective action, smack of socialism, or even communism.

Even now, Donald Trump says in order for us to move forward we’ve got to open up the market as fast as possible, health risks be damned. Of course, he is facing an election in a few months and bad markets don’t bode well for winning presidential elections. So, winning in November could possibly be where his true motivation lies.

Again, the market isn’t going to save us here. And if we move forward relying on it to do so, I believe America is doomed to fail. It’s doomed to fail not only the COVID-19 test, but quite possibly, doomed to fail and fall from it’s historic position as the greatest nation on earth…

But it doesn’t have to be that way. There’s still time to reverse course.

Mind you, reversing course doesn’t mean adopting socialism, or communism. But it does mean realizing that only collective action is going to get us out of this one, as well as that other (bigger) one looming on the horizon (in the form of rising CO2 levels).

I know what some of you are thinking…wait a minute, isn’t the solution a vaccine and won’t the development of such a vaccine be a product of a competitive market?

Well, with 3.5 million cases and 250,000 deaths, I can only hope that no one gets rich off of the development of a vaccine. After all, Jonas Salk never even filed for a patent for his polio vaccine. In fact, the very idea that someone, or some corporation, would get filthy rich off of a vaccine for this horrible disease gets to the very heart of my point…

If we can only save ourselves if there’s sufficient economic benefit in doing so, we’re f’ing doomed!

The nation-wide stay at home order, that we have collectively obeyed for the most part (well, at least until recently), is just one of the collective measures I’m getting at…

I’m also talking about collective effort to help the most vulnerable. The ones who have and will suffer the most from this crisis…

Those (like Trump himself) who’ve done well at exploiting the market, while it was still running on all cylinders, they’ll be just fine…

But that accounts for only a small percentage…Bernie’s 1%. The rest of us, we need help…collective help. Help of the kind that our government can and should be expected to provide…

If the market has been our magic carpet ride to greatness, well, that rug has been pulled right out from under us!

What’s our responsibility in this? Because we Americans, if we’re anything, we’re responsible, right?

Our responsibility is to turn from the madness of the market-as-the-only solution mindset.

Let’s face it, there is a clear and concise answer to the question, why is America failing the COVID-19 test?

We alone have the power to shift that paradigm and save ourselves…

Will we?

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders

Agenda-based Science in the Age of COVID-19

April 24, 2020 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

Agenda-based Science in the Age of COVID-19

When did we stop trusting in science?

Those of the fundamentalist religious persuasion stopped trusting around the time of the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925. And as far as that crowd goes, things haven’t changed a whole lot since then…

But how about the rest of us, who consider ourselves a bit more even-keeled?

It seems these days a healthy trust in, versus skepticism of, science always breaks down along political lines. The democrats seem to be much more accepting of the prognostications of science than are the republicans.

Why is that?

It seems to have something to do with the now decades long “controversy” surrounding climate change. Although, I believe the real reason goes a bit deeper than just that.

Climate change is accepted science…period. I’m not going to waste any effort here trying to argue that point. You can do your own research…just do it in the right places and avoid the crackpots. And these days there’s no shortage of those!

Acceptance of climate change breaks down along political lines, more-so than perhaps any scientific topic in modern history. You might have to go back to the Copernican revolution to find a more hotly debated topic surrounding settled science.

According to Pew Research, 90% of democrats believe the government is doing too little to combat climate change, versus 39% of republicans.

Why is climate change so hard for republicans to accept?

Well, one could point to the leadership, or lack thereof, by our current president. He is a staunch climate change denier (or, at best, skeptic) and he influences millions of his die-hard supporters to believe likewise…

And he has Fox News constantly backing him up!

Republicans tend to believe that the whole climate change issue is wrapped up in agenda-based science, or science in pursuit of a political agenda…

And what is that agenda, exactly?

According to republicans, it is to turn the U.S.A. into a socialist, or even communist, state. Republicans distrust big government…such distrust is the very sine quo non of conservatism…

Never-mind that in many ways Donald Trump has expanded government far beyond his predecessor(s). One need only look at the current federal deficit for proof of that.

When civilization is faced with big non-economic problems, like an alien invasion (of the “outer-space” variety), meteor strike, an out of control climate, or a world-wide pandemic, it’s usually science that comes to the rescue.

Science supplies us with the facts and the actions we need to take based on those facts. Then it takes collective action, i.e. government action, to execute those scientific-based solutions…

COVID-19 presents one of these instances where humanity must turn to science for answers, perhaps like none other in recent generations. That’s not to downplay the effect of climate change, but climate change is a creeping problem, whereas COVID-19 has jumped up and bit us in the ass overnight…to the tune of over 50,000 deaths in the U.S. alone, and counting.

Nevertheless, we have some out there, mostly on the right, who’re playing politics with a freaking virus, as if it could possibly be cognizant of political affiliation.

The truth is that science and politics, like religion and politics, make for strange bedfellows. In fact, there should be a wall of separation between them…

Oh wait, there is a wall between church and state…

How about between science and state?

It should not be up to republicans, or the republican president, to decide which science they (or he) will support. And the same, of course, goes with democrats. If science tells us that the only way to defeat COVID-19 is by collective action that will have economic repercussions, then that’s the solution we’re all faced with accepting, period.

Our capitalistic economic system is not science and neither is it decreed by the almighty. It’s just an economic theory that proposes a market solution to pretty much everything. But there’s not a market solution to COVID-19. Capitalism won’t save us here. Conservatism, with its belief in limited (or no) government, won’t save us here.

In fact, this crisis is dramatically exposing how capitalism, at least the kind that has run amok in the last few decades, is failing society.

The U.S.A. has surpassed all other countries in the world in virtually all statistics (i.e., the negative ones) related to COVID-19. The U.S.A. has the most cases, the most deaths, and one of the highest fatality rates.

This little bug has made a shambles of the mighty American market and of so-called American exceptionalism.

We must all immediately stop the madness of allowing political division to get in the way of doing the right thing. And that means doing the thing(s) science tells us to do, no matter how painful, or inconsistent with your political beliefs, it might be.

I’m afraid COVID-19 presents us with this stark choice between science and politics like nothing ever has, at least in my lifetime. This crisis is presenting us with hard choices. I can understand the tendency towards skepticism. But skepticism won’t serve us here. Playing politics with a pathogen won’t serve us here.

This tendency towards agenda-based science in the age of COVID-19 is going to show us how destructive the political division really can be…

Perhaps that’s the “agenda” of this virus?

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: Agenda-based Science, COVID-19

COVID-19: A Viral Perspective

March 15, 2020 by costaricaguy 2 Comments

COVID-19: A Viral Perspective

Just in case you haven’t heard, there’s a bug going round…

Oh ok, I guess you have heard…

One thing about this particular virus (at least for me) is that it’s encouraging a viral perspective of our world and place within it…

I’m especially referring to the following 5 areas of focus…

Globalization

Viruses have always been avid world travelers. Even way back in 1918, before the advent of air travel, the Spanish Flu infected 500 million people around the world, or about 27% of the then world population of between 1.8 and 1.9 billion.

But these days, just one of these little bugs can hitch a jet ride from Wuhan (China) to Wilmington (N.C. or Delaware) inside the mucous membrane of an unsuspecting airline passenger and arrive within hours, allowing an infection to jump from continent to continent, riding first class at 500 mph!

We have to face the fact that our interconnectedness, commercially and socially, has put US (the big one, that is) at greater risk, even as it has lifted our quality of life.

For the past several years there’s been a backlash against globalization, primarily in the form of right-wing anti-immigration movements. Does COVID-19 bolster their case?

In a way, I guess, but I don’t believe globalization is going to go the way of the buggy whip anytime soon. Better to learn to live with it, even at some risk to our health, than attempt to fight the inevitable. Hopefully, COVID-19 will teach us a thing or two about how to reduce the risk for the future.

Capitalism

At the same time that right-wingers are decrying globalism, left-wingers are sounding the alarm against “capitalism run amok.”

Speaking of capitalism run amok, I read today that Donald Trump might be trying to buy exclusive rights to a future COVID-19 vaccine from a German firm, so that Americans would have access to it at the exclusion of everyone else.

Do I really need to ask if you can see what might be wrong with that idea?

[Note: The story referred to is not verified. Source was The Guardian. I posted it for illustrative purposes only…for all you out there ready to fake-news-shame me.]

But that’s sort of how capitalism works, right? It looks at life as a zero-sum contest where every transaction has a winner and a loser. And with the brand of capitalism that has come to dominate the world in the last, say, 50 years, there are precious few winners (around 1%) and a whole lot of losers (the rest of us).

A bright side of COVID-19 (if I may be so bold) could be that it will shine a spotlight on the failures of the current out-of-control capitalistic system and the neoliberal world order that has taken hold to foment it.

Scientific and Mathematic Truth

Lately every news item that’s detrimental to a particular political opinion is decried by the opposing side as fake news. Our very president has basically undermined the entire free press in the U.S. (at least any part of it other than Fox News and the few radio and TV talking heads that say nice things about him) as such. This has given rise to a dangerous phenomenon in which Americans can’t even agree on things that should be viewed as universal fact, or truth. Take the settled science of global warming, as a for instance.

And now even the existence of this virus is being labeled by some on the hard-right as a democratic (meaning communist) plot to derail the chances for Donald Trump to be elected to a second term.

Denying the existence of known threats to humanity, for political, religious, or idealogical reasons is, well, downright insanity.

And it is very dangerous to our national collective health.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump has seemed fairly invulnerable, until now. Hillary Clinton couldn’t defeat him (even after pussy-grabber-gate), the Special Counsel couldn’t nail him, and the Senate wouldn’t remove him (even though he was impeached by the House). He is the real and undisputed “teflon Don.” Well, that was until he addressed the nation the other night to outline his attack on this microscopic bug called COVID-19. His attempt to assuage the masses (and the markets) didn’t work. And his mighty “Trump economy” is currently at risk of failing as a direct and immediate result.

There’s not a whole lot Trump can point to proudly, other than the economy. So, if his economy goes down, it’s highly likely that Trump will go with it.

COVID-19 might just end up being what finally brings down the Donald.

Impact Mindfulness

We’re hearing a lot about “social distancing” these days. Basically, that means altering your habits to avoid too much direct human interaction. But old habits are hard to break, unless you have a really compelling reason to break them…

COVID-19 is providing that reason…to save others.

But if you’re not at risk of catching this thing (or, at least, dying from it), why should you limit your daily activities to binge watching Netflix?

Well, you’re being asked to right now. It’s not often that we’re called to so high a duty as to seriously alter our life-styles for the benefit of society as a whole.

That’s a level of altruism that’s probably making Ayn Rand roll around in her grave!

Moreover it’s just not consistent with the self-interested, small-us thinking that usually prevails in our dog-eat-dog, hard-core, capitalist, society.

And that might be the number 1 silver lining in this dark cloud we suddenly find ourselves under. Humans being generally mindful of their impacts on others AND in the U.S. even…who would’ve thunk it?

That might be a reason for us to say…

Hey thanks, COVID-19!

And that’s just a viral perspective of this COVID-19 pandemic…

Be safe out there (and wash your hands!).

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: COVID-19

This World Does Not Need Billionaires

February 3, 2019 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

There are a record 2,208 billionaires in the world, up from 2,043 in 2017, according to Forbes. And the average wealth of the billionaires is $4.1 billion, a record high.

Taken together, the billionaires of the world are worth $9.1 trillion, up from $7.7 trillion last year, Forbes reports.

What country has the most?

The U.S., of course, with 585 billionaires.

In 1987, when the Forbes 400 list was first issued, Forbes found 140 billionaires, including 96 outside of the U.S.

There’s no doubt that the reason for this exponential rise in the number of billionaires is an expanding free market around the world. In his most recent Washington Post column, Fareed Zakaria points out that this global expansion of the market has not just been good to billionaires, but for the poor and downtrodden as well. Fareed writes that “since 1990, more than 1 billion people have moved out of extreme poverty. The share of the global population living in these dire conditions has gone from 36 percent to 10 percent, the lowest in recorded history.”

Nevertheless, the pitchforks of populism have been raised against the billionaire elite class.

But is that really fair?

Perhaps an even better question to be asked is, are these elite billionaires essential to the success of free markets, or are they just an out-of-control symptom of that success?

And, moreover, now that we have seen such dramatic success in global free markets, shouldn’t “we” check to make sure that this success is not being funneled more and more narrowly to the enjoyment of a privileged few?

Fareed makes the point that on a world-wide scale, inequality has actually dropped over the last few decades. But that fact belies what is happening in individual markets of most western countries. In the U.S. inequality is now at levels not seen since the 1920’s. And that’s what is sparking the rise of populism on the left and right.

Of course, there are stark differences in the opinions of populists on the left and right about how to fix the inequality problem. Those on the right point to government by the elite as the problem, while those on the left look to government for solutions.

On the right we’ve seen the rise of Donald Trump. He claims to be a billionaire himself and his governing approach seems wholly market driven and transactional, a get government out of the way, trickle-down approach. He came into office saying that he would “drain the swamp”, but during his first two years it seems the swamp has only become “swampier.”

The left-leaning populists, led by the likes of Bernie Sanders and the newly minted, 29-year-old, congresswoman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), want to take some of the wealth concentrated at the top and spread it around for the benefit of those in the middle to bottom rungs of the economic ladder.

Who’s right?

I’ve never really understood how voters were conned into believing that a billionaire, who benefits from inequality, could be trusted to do anything about it. And so far Trump has accomplished zero that one could reasonably argue is against the economic self-interest of the billionaire class, which he claims to be a member of.

Truth be told, no one really needs to be a billionaire. That’s more money than any person can ever expect to spend in one, or even several, lifetimes. So, what happens is that all that wealth gets handed over to succeeding generations of billionaires and that’s how inequality is perpetuated over the decades.

Would it really do great damage to the free market for there to be less, or even no, billionaires?

The argument that staunch free-marketers usually make is that if you take away wealth from billionaires, you’ll also take away their incentive to achieve those phenomenal business successes that, admittedly, inure to the benefit of society at large.

But does the disincentive argument really hold water?

If the highest net worth I could ever expect to achieve in my lifetime was one dollar short of a billion, would I just throw my hands up and run off to Costa Rica to live a stress-free life in the jungle? Well, I sort of did do that, but it certainly wasn’t a result of my disillusionment about never being able to become a billionaire.

I think it’s just downright silly to suggest that the world would take a turn towards the dark ages if “we” refused to allow a tiny (and growing) group of elites to continue to control more wealth than 90% of the world’s population.

The premise behind the free-market argument in support of the billionaire class is that they worked hard for their money, so they deserve to keep it.

But do billionaires really “work harder” than, say, brick-layers?

Billionaires achieve such incredible degrees of wealth because they take very intelligent advantage of markets in a way that’s consistent with the following Noam Chomsky quote…

A basic principle of modern state capitalism is that costs and risks are socialized to the extent possible, while profit is privatized.

One of the largest categories of billionaires is that of the so-called tech giants, like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg. But where would those guys be without the internet? And where did we get the internet? From the John Q. Taxpayer funded government, that’s where.

Billionaires are interesting characters, that’s for sure. Life would certainly be more boring without them. They are more than just super successful businesspeople. They’re celebrities. We love to read about them. We inspire to be like them. We hang on their every eccentric move.

So, I guess in that sense, the existence of this odd creature called the billionaire does add some positive entertainment to our world. The problem is that this entertainment value comes at a great societal cost as inequality spins wildly out of control with the birth of each newly minted billionaire.

In my opinion, this world does not need billionaires…

when the people of Flint, Michigan still don’t have clean water…

when over 20% of children in the richest country on earth live in poverty and go to bed hungry…

when the wealthiest 1 percent of households owns 40% of the entire country’s wealth.

As the notorious AOC was quoted recently as saying…

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Flint Michigan

A Purpose for Consciousness

December 4, 2018 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

A Purpose for Consciousness

Yuval Noah Harari, whose writings I referenced in my last post, entitled, A Philosophy of Everything, tells us that technological advances in infotech and biotech are driving a de-coupling between consciousness and intelligence.

That sounds odd because we tend to think that the two, intelligence and consciousness, are one and the same, or at least closely linked.

Ah, but you see, they really aren’t.

The reason we tend to believe that they are is because thinking generally accompanies feeling, and vice versa. Even though we don’t really need the feeling, or emotion, of fear (or anger) for the intelligence of our brains to make our legs (or fists) move, we always seem to have that feeling anytime we come across some external stimuli that inspires a fight or flight response.

The geniuses of Silicon Valley are well aware of this de-coupling. They are well aware that intelligence can exist, and does in fact exist in the form of AI (artificial intelligence), completely divorced from the consciousness that seems only capable of being experienced by organic beings.

So, what’s the purpose of consciousness? Does it have any redeeming purpose whatsoever, or is just like background noise? Does the brain really need consciousness in order to do its work? The fact that there are millions of intelligent operations going on inside your body every moment, controlled by your brain, but without your being the least bit conscious of them, tends to suggest that it doesn’t.

In my post, A Philosophy of Everything, I offered the following vague statement of purpose for consciousness…

The philosophy of everything that I’m alluding to is one in which this higher level of consciousness, as the root of objective reality, is that which gives meaning to our existence. It is the tie that binds everything together, regardless of which stories we might have individually bought into. At this unifying level of consciousness we feel compassionate towards our fellow humans. We do not allow stories to distract us from our inherent commonality.

I also alluded to the fact that the obvious way most of us experience consciousness on a day-to-day basis is at the level of the ego, or the self. We become conscious at a very early age that we are separate from everything around us…of the dual role between subject and object.

But is that really what our consciousness exists to do? That is, to separate us? My philosophy of everything suggests not and I wanted to delve a little deeper into that idea with this post.

Of course it is true, as Harari tells us, that science hasn’t the foggiest idea what consciousness is and even less why it is. So, anything I suggest in this post is, of course, completely unscientific…

Well, almost…

There are some weird things, some “spooky action at a distance”, if you will, that science has discovered about reality, that appears to perhaps be a function of consciousness. Some of this weird stuff even goes so far as to suggest that consciousness is the root of all reality.

You’ve probably heard about the famous “double-slit” experiment. But, if not, here’s a brief (and unscientifically crude) explanation…

Scientists fire particles (photons in the form of a beam) at a barrier with two vertical slits. Some of the particles go through one slit and some go through the other. This should project an expected stacked particle pattern onto the backdrop. However, the weird thing is that the resulting pattern is instead what is called an “interference pattern”, which is indicative of a wave function. It seems that the individual particles somehow go through both slits, as if they were waves rather than particles.

Now, if that weren’t weird enough, it gets even weirder. When the scientists place a detector in front of the barrier to monitor which slit the particles enter, the pattern changes. It becomes the normal pattern one would expect particles to exhibit, rather than the strange wave pattern.

Why in the world does this happen? Why would the act of measurement, requiring a conscious observer, cause the wave pattern to collapse?

No one has a clue…

The implication, however, is clear. The act of conscious observation seems to cause the particles to choose a certain form. And the implications of that are fairly profound for the role consciousness could play in the existence of our universe.

Not long ago a theoretical physicist turned surfer dude named Garrett Lisi came up with an alternative to “String Theory” he calls e8 Theory. Lisi strongly believes his e8 Theory to be a better candidate for a theory of everything that finally unites general relativity and quantum physics. Rather than attempt another crude explanation, I’ll suffice it to say for our purposes that others, specifically a group called the Quantum Gravity Research Group, have taken Lisi’s theory much deeper with their “Emergence Theory”, which suggests that consciousness could play the key role in forming the building blocks of reality.

Now, neither of these theories are anywhere close to being considered acceptable science, but the fact remains that science is more and more looking at the role consciousness plays in our reality.

However, it doesn’t seem to me that this role would simply be one of self-consciousness, ego-driven separation and the duality of subject and object. I am led to believe that something quite the opposite might be going on…

My last post suggested, based largely on what Harari says in his books, that it’s the fictional layer of reality comprised of the stories we make up that’s motivating the ego to do its dirty work of separation (usually for self-preservation). And dirty it is as this separation has certainly caused much of the strife in our world.

And yet there seems to be this higher level of consciousness in which the duality of subject and object melts away. Many have experienced this higher level though psychedelic drugs, while others have achieved it via an intense practice of meditation.

The universal way consciousness tends to be felt by organic species is via pain and pleasure. In fact, we are buffeted about during our entire lives between these two polar opposites of consciousness…that is, until we discover that there is a way to rise above it. And maybe that’s exactly what consciousness beckons us to do.

I heard Ram Dass once say that “the purpose behind an incarnation is the elimination of suffering”, or something along those lines.

You might be asking, how can I sit here and conjecture that consciousness could have such a purpose, or really any purpose at all?

I don’t know…and in fact I’m really just thinking out loud (and trying to inspire you to do that same) with these crazy posts…

However, it’s evident to me that consciousness does indeed permeate our reality. It is something we share. It is something that connects us and on that higher level of connection (what Ram Dass calls “loving awareness”) motivates profound compassion, one incarnate being towards another.

Perhaps then we should not be trying to ascribe a purpose for consciousness, but rather try to better understand the purpose and meaning it ascribes to us.

I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.

Max Planck

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: consciousness, double-slit experiment, e8 theory, garrett lisi, ram dass, Yuval Noah Harari

A Philosophy of Everything

November 28, 2018 by costaricaguy 1 Comment

A Philosophy of Everything

The greatest scientific quest of the 21st century has been (and continues to be) a “theory of everything” that ties general relativity and quantum mechanics together. The missing link between the two is a quantum description of the gravitation force that we are all very familiar with.

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about a similar notion of a “philosophy of everything.” That is, a common philosophy that encompasses economics, politics, and science, and melds it all into a general meaning for our existence on this microscopically small revolving blue rock in the middle of a vast universe.

It seems that the “tie that binds” it all together is consciousness. I know that might sound weird, but more and more that’s what “they” are saying. By they I mean many of the current notable philosophical and spiritual thinkers (and even some scientists). After all, one of the greatest mysteries in science, in addition to quantum gravity, is the nature of consciousness…what exactly is it and where did it come from? The conundrum of consciousness is akin to the what came first, chicken or egg, riddle. That is, does the mind (i.e., our biological brain) produce consciousness, or vice versa. In fact, there is growing evidence that the root of reality is indeed, consciousness.

The spiritual, philosophical and scientific thinkers that I’m referring to are the likes of neuroscientist, Sam Harris, spiritual guru, Baba Ram Dass, historian and philosopher, Yuval Noah Harari, among others.

Particularly illuminating to me as of late has been the trilogy of books by Yuval Noah Harari. Those are, in order of their publication, Sapiens, Homo Deus, and his latest book, 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. If you haven’t read them, you certainly should.

Harari tell us that humans now live in a dual reality. Actually, we’ve sort of been living in one since the dawning of civilization, which encompasses only 1/3 of 1% of the 1.5 million year history of our species. There’s the objective reality of the things we can see, touch, taste, hear and smell. And then there’s this fictional layer of reality that has been superimposed by us over that objective reality. The fictional layer is comprised of made-up stories…yea that’s right, fairy tales, more or less.

Now, even though these stories are not really real, they nevertheless have had enormous impacts upon our species. In fact, Harari tells us that these stories are what has allowed mass human cooperation, which has elevated our species above the 9 million or so others that share space with us on planet Earth. Of course, one of the main categories of stories has to do with religion, but there are many others as well…such as democracy, capitalism, socialism, human rights and even money. All these have no objective existence apart from the stories that we’ve made up and that have become widely accepted.

And that’s not necessarily a bad thing…to a point.

Of course, the story of money has been a great benefit to humankind. Even though these small scraps of paper, generally adorned with grainy images of dead notables, do not have any intrinsic value in and of themselves…well, perhaps to light a fire, or substitute for Scott tissue versus dried leaves on an ill-equipped camping trip…they have facilitated widespread economic cooperation that has had great benefits to human society writ large.

However, it pays to remember that these stories, including the one about money, are, in fact, just stories. We made them up and we can un-make them up.

But here’s the thing, the stories have now taken on such an elevated and integrated role in human society that in many ways they now command objective reality itself. Take the capitalist economic story that led to the great industrial revolution that swept across the globe and elevated the quality of life for billions. We have come to realize, through science, that this story and the cooperative action it has spawned across the human race is now actually commanding the objective reality of our planet’s climate…to the potential risk of our very extinction!

Political and religious stories have been both good and bad. While they have given birth to nations and inspired the exploration of new geographic frontiers, they have also given rise to massive and completely unnecessary wars, death and mayhem.

These stories are so powerful that not only do they command the objective “exterior” reality of our day-to-day existence, they command the “interior” as well. In other words, they are so powerful as to effect consciousness itself.

On the level of the ego, which is the level of consciousness where most of us mere mortals live on a day-to-day basis, these stories reign supreme. They deeply influence our almost every conscious thought and thus command the actions flowing from those thoughts.

In short, these stories are powerful things, both for good and for bad.

However, the ego level is only one lower level of consciousness. There are higher ones. I know that might sound a little “out there” for some who could be reading this. But if you’ve ever tried meditation you’ll quickly learn that you’re really not in control of your thoughts at all. The stories are in control, as well as parts of your brain that have evolved over million of years and still harbor fight or flight notions that dominated the consciousness of our distant cave-dwelling ancestors. The goal of meditation is to quiet all that down and reach a higher level of consciousness where the stories in fact do NOT reign supreme. And that is inherently achievable, as millions of meditators do it quite successfully as a daily practice.

The philosophy of everything that I’m alluding to is one in which this higher level of consciousness, as the root of objective reality, is that which gives meaning to our existence. It is the tie that binds everything together, regardless of which stories we might have individually bought into. At this unifying level of consciousness we feel compassionate towards our fellow humans. We do not allow stories to distract us from our inherent commonality.

The stories are currently causing widespread division in American society and an alarming lack of compassion between those clinging to these competing fictions, such as democrat and republican.

The point is that we need not cling to the stories. We can choose to use them for our benefit and discard, or modify, them when they no longer serve us well.

We can seek a higher level of consciousness in which these stories do not command our inner, nor our outer, objective realities.

We may be at a point where our future existence depends on a philosophy of everything that leads us to do just that.

Filed Under: Impact over Interest, Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: Baba Ram Dass, Philosophy of Everything, Sam Harris, Theory of Everything, Yuval Noah Harari

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 26
  • Next Page »

Connect with RM

Revolutionary Misfit social media connections...

  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Impact Mindfulness
  • The Blog & Podcast
  • Books

Copyright © 2025 · Parallax Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in