Revolutionary Misfit

Dare to be Inspirational

  • Impact Mindfulness
    • The Movement
    • Impact over Interest
    • The Big US
    • Removing Impact Blinders
    • People Planet Universe
    • Revolutionary Misfit Creed
  • The Blog & Podcast
    • Blog Archive
    • World Changers Expat Podcast
    • The LA County Jail Series
    • Costa Rica Expat Tours
    • About the Author
  • Books
    • The Rev Misfit Manifesto
    • The Impact Revolution
    • Expat Mindfulness – The Book
    • Definitive Guide to CR Expat Living

The Proverbial House of Cards

October 8, 2014 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

the proverbial house of cards

My last post, as well as others, may have alluded to some hostility I feel towards religion. I don’t really feel “hostile” towards it…

just altogether fed up with it.

Here’s an example of what I’m talking about.

In the video below, Bill O’Reilly tells Richard Dawkins that because science cannot yet explain “everything”, Bill’s “throwing in with Jesus.”

In what sense, Mr. O’Reilly?

In the sense of your boisterous and blustering American bravado and exceptionalism that raises the red, white and blue, along with its wars and capitalism run amok, as idols to be worshipped and praised as if they were stamped with the approval of the man, Jesus, himself?

Isn’t that what you, and the network that brings your brand of “religion” into millions of homes every evening, are all about?

Certainly seems so to me…

But the Jesus that I’m familiar with, the one that said “blessed are the meek”, I don’t believe that one would approve.

I don’t believe he would want to “throw in” with you at all.

He might even tell you to lower your arrogant voice and listen to what your guests have to say, for a change.

What Mr. Dawkins was trying to tell you is that your religion may rest on a foundation that is the proverbial house of cards.

Consider that the christian idea of Jesus as god incarnate, who came to rescue us from our sins via his atoning death…

that entire idea is based on the concept of original sin as presented by the book of Genesis in the Old Testament.

Now, I know that “thinking” christians like yourself, desire to pick and choose what parts of the bible you want to accept as fact and what parts you dismiss as allegory.

But it’s hard, no impossible, to dismiss the story of original sin as allegory.

After all, everything that comes after it, including the need for Jesus’ very existence, is based directly on it.

And if it is “allegory”, then allegory of what exactly?

That man (and I guess we should include woman as well) is borne sinful…i.e., sin is built into his genes, and therefore he deserves punishment and is in dire need of atonement?

That’s just the way god set it all up?

Well, that doesn’t paint a very pleasant portrait of god, now does it?

That he designed us in such a way that he would have to sacrifice his son (who was actually, ah, him)  in order to avoid the need to punish us with eternal death?

Sort of a planned obsolescence?

That tends to portray god as less intelligent designer and more demented psychopath, doesn’t it?

The concept of original sin requires, by its very nature, some place from which that sin in fact originated…

Doesn’t it?

And the bible clearly tells us that place is with Adam…the first created human.

But the problem is that his very existence is refuted by everything we know from science.

In short, it simply never happened.

So, everything else that follows, including the story of Jesus’ atoning death, is really…unnecessary.

That’s not to say Jesus wasn’t a real person who walked the earth and was crucified for insurrection by the Romans over 2,000 years ago.

And that his reported words give rise to one of the greatest moral philosophies of our time…and one that Bill O’Reilly seems not to have a clue about.

No, that we’re pretty sure of based on historic fact.

But the rest of it, sort of folds under the weight of it’s own ridiculousness.

Dawkins is hostile towards religion because he believes it impedes intellectual growth.

In that sense, it is a barrier to the continued evolutionary progress that he quite “religiously” believes in.

I, on the other hand, just believe that it is a blinder…

an impact blinder.

That it too often serves as a mental barrier against taking action that will positively impact humanity on a scale wider than simply tithing to your local church, or trying to convince others to believe the craziness that you do.

And that’s even more the case with the warped sense of “patriotic religion” to which Bill O’Reilly obviously subscribes.

image credit: undereachsnare92 via Compfight cc

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: removing impact blinders, Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion

The Delightful Folly of Fools

September 26, 2014 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

fool's gold

And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.

Jesus in Matthew 5:22

“Foolishness” comes in many sizes, shapes and colors…

Chris Guillebeau took ten years to accomplish the foolish quest of visiting every nation on earth…

Felix Baumgartner rides a capsule strapped to a balloon to the edge of space and then, foolishly, jumps…

Giovanni di Pietro di Bernardone (aka, Saint Francis of Assisi) strips in the public square and renounces the “worldly life”…

Ernesto “Che” Guevara joins a misfit band of Cuban revolutionaries under the leadership of Fidel Castro, taking off in a leaky boat from Mexico, bound for Cuba with the foolish idea of taking control of the island from a ruthless, U.S. backed, dictator…

Christopher Johnson McCandless donates all the money saved for law school, burns the cash left in his pocket, and sets off with a backpack for the Alaskan wilderness to “find himself”…

John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the 35th President of the U.S., makes a foolish vow on behalf of a nation of “landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth by the end of the decade.”

It’s easy to call someone who is doing something you don’t agree with, or you don’t understand, a fool.

From the perspective of the audience, the onlookers, the “peanut gallery”, that’s exactly how you might appear…

foolish.

But the truth is, nothing really beautiful would ever happen in this world if it weren’t for the foolish.

Maybe that’s the reason for Jesus’ strong admonishment against calling someone a fool.

It’s of course foolish, in the eyes of the world, for one person to think him or herself capable of greatness.

For some reason, perhaps some evil reason, the consensus will always be against such notions.

“Who are you to think…!” is usually what you’ll get if you divulge your dreams of divine inspiration.

But those who achieve noteworthy things, remarkable things, are people who plunged ahead in spite of being called a fool.

In fact, they were perhaps delighted to be so called.

Anyone who ever thought themselves capable of spilling ideas onto paper that might one day inspire a generation is certainly at first a fool…

and then later, a Pulitzer prize winner and legend of literary exploit.

But no one ever accomplished such feats without initially exposing themselves to being ridiculed as a fool.

Think about it.

Don’t be afraid of being a fool, or being called a fool.

Cherish it and act accordingly.

Because the world is in need of less status quo stagnation and more of the exploits and accomplishments that flow from the delightful folly of fools.

Sometimes, often times, it’s the foolish things that bring meaning to a seemingly meaningless life.

Suffering fools gladly is a great lesson in humility and patience…

But suffering gladly as a fool is a requirement for many impact-full endeavors.

image credit: cogdogblog via Compfight cc

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: removing impact blinders

God is Not Dead was a Dud

September 21, 2014 by costaricaguy 2 Comments

the good thing about science

I recently watched the movie God is Not Dead, (or, God’s Not Dead). I’d heard a lot of people talking about it on Facebook, so I decided to give the flick a look-see…on Netflix.

Here are 5 reasons why I think God’s Not Dead was a dud…

Reason 1: Sloppy Stereotyping

Hollywood is often guilty of stereotyping, but this movie takes the cake. There was such a stark delineation between the good guys and the bad ones. With the bad being really obnoxiously bad and the good, nauseatingly neat, prim and proper. Sorry, but life just isn’t like that.

In short, the sinners were just too sinister, and the saved too saintly, to not strain credulity.

Reason 2: Detached Demonizing

I was especially taken aback by how much of a demon this movie makes out to be not only the poor and demented philosophy professor, but really the entire higher education system. It’s as if the movie tries to plant the idea that there’s an underlying motive to convince our sons and daughters to convert into evil robotic atheists hell-bent on destroying our “christian” American society.

They kill the evil professor off at the end in the most painful way (he was run over by a truck), only to have him repent and accept Jesus in a middle of the rainy road “death-bed” confession. I guess he got what was coming to him for trying to impose his faith on his students.

But isn’t that exactly what this entire movie attempts to do on its viewers?

Reason 3: Rachety Reasoning

I listened to the fresh and spot clean “pre-law” student deliver his argument for a living creator and saviour to his classmates, but for the life of me I couldn’t possibly follow his reasoning. Maybe I’m just not smart enough, or possibly it’s because none of it made the slightest lick of sense. He was of course able to sway the entire class to the embarrassing mockery of the evil prof, who after all only had the facts of science to go on.

Reason 4: a Tear-jerked Termination

Do all christian movies end with concerts? Seems so. And this one didn’t fail to deliver. Another of the non-christian evil doers, inserted into the plot haphazardly, makes a confession with the band backstage (she was a reporter of sorts, or a blogger, the movie didn’t really make that clear). That was motivated by an earlier terminal cancer diagnosis and resulting breakup with her evil capitalist pig of a boyfriend.

Why were all the non-christians in this movie so inherently evil, or screwed up? I know many who aren’t.

Also, I thought christianity and capitalism went together like Reagan and Robertson (Pat, that is)?

Reason 5: The Gaping Abyss

The thing that really left me wondering at the end is this: So let’s say there is a god (I do believe that, by the way). Why does he have to be christian and why is the bible the best source for explaining his doings? That question was not answered in the slightest way and to me is the greatest fault underlying this dud of a movie.

Perhaps because it’s a question that cannot possibly be answered.

You see I have this belief that faith is a personal issue and should not be used as a sword to divide. But in this movie that’s exactly what it’s used for.

Yes, it takes a great deal of faith to be an atheist…perhaps as much or more than it does to be a christian. Neither should be condemned, nor demonized.

I’m more for beating the swords into ploughshares that might serve some benefit for us all.

Unfortunately this movie fails in that effort, miserably…

and really doesn’t prove a damn thing.

image credit: Chris Piascik via Compfight cc

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: god's not dead, removing impact blinders

A Suffix that Sucks

September 16, 2014 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

A Suffix that Sucks!

Lately my mind has been over-preoccupied with visions of “re-patriation.”

Needless to say, new ones (i.e., ideas, visions, etc.) have been kinda crowded out in that process.

But, thankfully, I have my good old stash of CRG posts (all 612 of them) out there to be used on occasion for spare parts…

I’ve received a few comments on various posts over the years that attempt to label me as one of those nut-jobs who leans towards socialism, or even communism.

Hell, some will quickly label you that way as soon as they find out you voted for Obama.

I believe some might get that impression because in the past I’ve mentioned the likes of Che, or Sandino in a favorable light.

Actually I really don’t feel qualified to judge the ways in which men choose to govern themselves.

I simply call it like I see it.

I once observed the world through very restrictive lenses…

Back then, if you didn’t believe in my Big Three C’s of Christ, Capitalism and Conservatism (the Republican political brand) you were doomed to the fiery depths of hell.

When you grow up in a particular place and associate only with particular people, you tend to have views about the world that are “in line” with your environment.

That’s understandable.

But almost invariably as soon as one ventures out a bit further from the fold, new vistas of thought and perception open.

Especially if you’re a person who isn’t content to just take in new experiences sensorially…

and not allow yourself to venture into deeper levels of awareness.

You may refuse yourself that luxury because of being so anchored in your traditional experience of life.

You’re content to play the role of outsider looking in.

But then there are those adventurous types who open up their hearts and minds, becoming a part of their experience.

I’m definitely one of those types.

And I’ve become a part of the Latin American experience.

I’m still a gringo, no doubt about that (I get reminded of it frequently), but I’ve come to empathize with the feelings that Latin people have towards my previous paradigm that would have quickly condoned capitalistic imperialism as being “the will of God.”

It isn’t.

And all that leads not to the conclusion that I’m a socialist, nor a communist.

In fact, I don’t believe that any particular brand of ism, meaning a scheme of government, world-view, or religion, has it 100% right.

In my humble opinion, ISM is a suffix that sucks!

You see, when folks believe that they do (have it all right), problems occur, resentments are fomented, wars are started, people are oppressed and slaughtered and humanity is generally brought a notch lower.

I don’t have the answers and don’t mean to pretend to.

I don’t believe anyone does.

But I do believe in a few things.

Like being compassionate and open-minded and trying to understand why people believe and behave differently and not condemning them for doing so.

I also believe that we’re all connected.

That there’s some force outside of our understanding that is in control and has given us a purpose and that it’s not to pursue our destruction (that word “our” implying and encompassing a sense of connectedness with each other, the natural world, and the universe).

Too often the isms lead us down that road of mutually assured destruction.

Usually it’s because we become convinced in our hearts and minds that “we” are right and “they” are wrong.

But that just isn’t necessarily so and until we can begin to grasp the idea that no one’s completely right and that we’re all in this (boat) together, I’m fearful that we will go on destroying each other and our planet.

I believe that most of these ism’s, world views, religions, or whatever you want to call them have some element of good in them.

The “good” that works for the common benefit of the entire connected world.

Maybe we should just focus on that and disregard all the rest.

image credit: phill.d via Compfight cc

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders, The Big US Tagged With: communism, removing impact blinders, socialism, the big us

The Public Flogging of Ray Rice

September 10, 2014 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

The Public Flogging of Ray Rice

OK, you know sometimes these public floggings of celebs caught red-handed (these days routinely exposed by Youtube video) can get almost as ugly as the events that precipitate them.

Yes, I am appalled and disgusted by the video of Ray Rice punching out his fiance in an elevator. I don’t want to see it again…ever.

I would like a show of hands…

How many have endured familial episodes of domestic violence (by the way, my own hand is raised right now)?

Violence in any form is despicable. Violence against women and children, even more-so.

And it occurs in millions of homes and situations across the land every moment of every day.

Should it be roundly condemned?

Of course it should.

Should one man be singled out for selective judgment against every episode of domestic abuse?

No, in my opinion he shouldn’t.

According to the predominant religion of the land, we’ve already had someone sacrificed for “our” sins.

Oh for sure, the natural reaction to a video like that is to seek vengeance.

It seems every guy out there wants to punch Ray out…probably a few who are just as guilty as he is.

And every woman would surely like to see him subjected to an even worse and more permanent fate.

But vengeance won’t solve the bigger problem.

Violence against violence usually begets more of the same.

Scapegoating one guy who happens to be a pro football star, who was caught in the act, is not going to solve this issue.

It’s kinda like capital punishment. Sure it makes us feel better that “justice” has been administered…

but the crime still goes on, wholly undeterred.

My views should in no way be taken as excusing the behaviour of Ray Rice. He should be punished and he will be (in fact, he’s already been pretty severely “clocked”).

Should his life be completely and utterly destroyed?

No, I don’t think so…not if he’s truly repentant about the act.

And it appears that he is.

So, why not get away from publicly crucifying one man and place our focus on the much bigger issue…

Violence, specifically in this case, domestic violence…

but maybe its a good excuse to attack the whole issue of violence in our society…in general…

because, in my opinion, there’s way too much of it.

How often do domestic violence incidents, as well as violent acts in general, take place on our TV sets and in our movie theatres…as well as the stands of National Football League games?

Speaking as one who endured the horror of domestic violence as a child…

(you see, the victims aren’t just the ones that get battered.)

I will say that the sort of violence that occurred on that video is deplorable, but in reality it’s something that we humans do to one another all too often.

How about we just stop that altogether?

That’s the point of this post.

You see, the issue is really not Ray Rice…

It’s us.

image credit: zwartevis via Compfight cc

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: Ray Rice, removing impact blinders

Matter Matters

September 9, 2014 by costaricaguy Leave a Comment

If It's Matter, It Matters

Sometimes I run across things I’ve written years ago that still seem quite relevant today…

Like this matter-full post from way back when…actually the reference to my age gives it away, since I’m now 53 (well, almost 54)…

Maybe it’s just me, but it seems that there’s something different about the world these days.

People seem to be a bit more edgy and fearful now than any time since I was born 48 years ago.

Of course, I didn’t live through the two great world wars, the Great Depression, the Holocaust, or other seminal world events of the past.

Maybe this same eery and unpleasant feeling was lingering in the air back then as well.

But something strange is in our air, or “airwaves”, since everything now is media driven…

sometimes I believe to the point of being “driven” right off a cliff.

I can hear it in my mother’s voice when I talk with her.

People are fearful about stuff, or maybe I should say fearful about losing their “stuff.”

And that brings me to the topic of today’s post, matter.

In my simplistic and wholly unscientific view the universe is divided into two categories of matter.

You have the things that are natural, such as all forms of life, the earth itself, the atmosphere, oceans, land, and everything else natural that the universe contains.

Then you have the things that are man-made.

One exists by the hand and will of god (or perhaps the “god particle”) and the other by the hand and will of, well, us.

It seems that most of the problems we pay attention to in the world today are those that pose threats to all the man-made stuff.

Protecting the natural world at the expense of our laser-like focus on the man-made shit is scoffed at by too many of us.

But doesn’t it all matter…really?

Now I’m not advocating that we all go back to living in caves and hunting and gathering.

But I am advocating that there be some balance restored in our approach to what matters…

because it all does.

We have gone so far in creating a world of comfort for ourselves at the expense of the natural that we are at the tipping point where our actions are having a profound and negative effect on the natural world.

In short, we’re pissing off Mother Nature.

This obsessive focus on man-made material comfort, a focus that says only “we” matter, is getting us in a lot of trouble these days.

The climate is changing because of it.

Organisms are disappearing.

The order of nature is being upset.

Greed is now good.

And we are literally consuming ourselves out of existence.

And everyone wants to blame everyone else.

It’s the Republicans fault. No, it’s the Democrats that did it. No, the Muslims! The Christians! No, says Trump, it’s those damn Chinese…

and so it goes without end.

The truth is we’re all at fault, every single one of us.

Because we, the human organism, are the only form of matter that has the ability to destroy this planet…well, short of a wayward asteroid, or an unstable Higgs Boson particle.

And we are doing a pretty darn good job of it.

The jaguar can’t do that. They just live according to their god-given instincts. They can’t decide to build an atomic bomb, or kidnap other animals for ransom, or commit any of the millions of dastardly deeds that humans inflict upon themselves.

They don’t burn or chop down the forest, or go to war with other animals.

They just live according to the plan that was laid out for them.

So, what’s the plan for us?

Are we living according to the right plan, or have we gotten off track?

I think what needs to occur is that we stop making every argument a political one, especially those that concern our planet and the health of it.

That we start taking action to correct the errors that have brought us to where we are now.

That doesn’t mean that we lose our comforts of life, our homes and cars, cities, planes, railroads and all those other things that make us feel better, or superior.

It just means that we start recognizing that it is not just all the man-made stuff that matters…because it all does.

Costa Rica is a country that is pretty low on the totem pole in terms of its rate of consumption compared with the developed countries of the world.

And it’s a place where folks do seem to get it when it comes to the idea that the natural world does matter.

I guess it’s easier to have a deep respect for nature when you’re surrounded by so much of it.

Maybe Costa Rica and other biodiversity hot spots around the world (the few that are left) can serve as giant classrooms to teach us humans that the natural world does matter.

That would be a pretty cool thing to see happen.

Maybe then we humans could come to realize that matter matters, whatever form it might take.

That realization is at the heart of impact mindfulness.

I hope we’re not too late.

image credit: Tambako the Jaguar via Compfight cc

Filed Under: Removing Impact Blinders Tagged With: removing impact blinders

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 16
  • Next Page »

Connect with RM

Revolutionary Misfit social media connections...

  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Impact Mindfulness
  • The Blog & Podcast
  • Books

Copyright © 2025 · Parallax Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in